I would say that probably 99% of the world’s women want to
be taken seriously. They want to be judged on their character, personality,
abilities, talents, and intellect. They want to be valued for who they are as a
person, who they are deep inside. They don’t want to be judged as just another
pretty face or just another pretty figure. They want to present the best
appearance possible, but they don’t want to be judged only by their bodies, as
mere sex objects.
I know this. I am a woman. I counsel women. I think I
understand women.
Knowing that women want to be taken seriously, I am amazed
at the choices athletes are making in the clothes routinely worn in sports
competitions. (Now, I enjoy sport as much as anyone. The Olympic games find me
yelling for my team. I scream along with everyone else when someone wins. I am
all for these young women.)
I don’t really understand why so many competitors choose the
skimpiest outfits possible, when I think, with maybe one or two exceptions, they
would be allowed to wear clothes that actually cover their bodies. It can’t be
necessary to have one’s backside halfway exposed. It can’t be necessary to
expose one’s whole middle. I can’t see that showing one’s body could possibly
help sports performance.
The other day I saw a runner line up wearing an adorable and
modest outfit. She wore a very bright yellow short-sleeved top with black trim.
Her black pants, which extended to just below the knee, had bright yellow stripes on
them. Nothing was baggy, and she looked very stylish.
Right now as I type, the women are competing in diving. (I
love that sport and used to practice it myself.) The fronts of most of the
suits are fine, but when the girls turn around, it looks like the seamstress
ran out of cloth! Could they not design suits to cover the girls’ backsides?
Years ago—not that many years ago—competitors in diving wore more coverage.
Does nakedness help them dive? I think not.
In most sports, the athletes have a variety of choices. They
can choose tighter or looser tops, shorter or longer tops. They can select
shorts, bikini bottoms, longer shorts, just above or below the knee shorts,
long leggings, or regular pants. They have options. Why do they usually choose
skimpy? Is it for TV ratings? Is it because they think they need to be sexy?
I understand that many of these girls probably grew up in
sport, wearing what almost everyone else does, and not really considering the
alternatives. Probably, most of the girls we see performing in the Olympics
haven’t given dress a second thought. I am certainly not judging them. But I am concerned for them.
These girls want to be taken seriously for their
accomplishments, their character, and their athletic prowess. They will be
photographed many times during these Olympic games, and everyone will be
looking at their bodies. They will be known for their image, which displays a lot of skin.
I don’t think it’s necessary to undress for good athletic
performance.
Maybe we could encourage young women athletes to consider making smarter
clothing choices. We can encourage them to display their character and
accomplishments instead of their skin. Let the sport do the talking!
God’s dress guidelines are modesty and moderation. If we are
Christians, and we practice a sport, we need to keep those two guidelines in
mind. If we do, we’ll be taken seriously, and we’ll gain respect.
I agree, Lou Ann. It used to be that even unsaved people had some degree of common decency. I saw an interview with one of the beach volleyball players where she said she liked pushing people's boundaries and making them uncomfortable. (Rolling eyes....)
ReplyDeleteSo well said! Thanks for being bold enough to say it! I miss watching diving and running with you, Mr. K., & Fuzz!
ReplyDelete